Assalam-o Aleikum
With respect to a replacement for high-density domestic routes I have aldeady suggested the 737-700/800, but I wonder if PIA would look at the 215 seat 737-900ER for regional routes ?
Boeing 737-900ER for PIA
-
- Registered Member
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 1:31 am
- Location: Townsville, Australia
-
- Registered Member
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 7:52 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
-
- Registered Member
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 7:52 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
Powered by the CFM International CFM56-7B turbofan engines, the new derivative will have substantial economic advantages over the competing A321 including 9 percent lower operating costs per trip and 7 percent lower operating costs per seat.
Launched in July 2005 with a 30-airplane order from Indonesian carrier Lion Air, the 737-900ER is designed to carry up to 215 passengers and fly up to 3,200 nautical miles (5,925 km).
The first 737-900ER is scheduled for delivery in the first half of 2007 after a five-month flight test program, which will include two flight test airplanes.
http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/200 ... 6a_nr.html
Launched in July 2005 with a 30-airplane order from Indonesian carrier Lion Air, the 737-900ER is designed to carry up to 215 passengers and fly up to 3,200 nautical miles (5,925 km).
The first 737-900ER is scheduled for delivery in the first half of 2007 after a five-month flight test program, which will include two flight test airplanes.
http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/200 ... 6a_nr.html
-
- Registered Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:34 am
- Location: Karachi
-
- Registered Member
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 7:52 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
-
- Registered Member
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:28 pm
-
- Registered Member
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 9:49 pm
- Location: Petropavlovsk
-
- Registered Member
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 8:10 am
- Location: E.London
No. LHE-MAN is 3462 nm and ISB-MAN is 3326 nm.sheriyars wrote:Does this means, it can do lhe-man and isb-man flghts for pia.
But it would be cool having 2 daily ISB-MAN terminating flights and on top the flights that would go to US and Canada....sorry could a lil carried away.
Back onto the topic. PK should go for B783 the one Behramjee is talking about purely because it carries more cargo and holds more passengers.
-
- Registered Member
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:43 pm
- Location: Oslo, Norway
In a country with so much potential air traffic in the future I think PIA should stick to Widebodies. Besides. Cargo revenue is important. With the limited airport infrastructure in our country it is smarter to use widebodies.
Look at Airblue. Already they had to lease 321 due to increase in demand.
With the traffic growth last year, think of how much travel there would be in only ten years time?
Look at Airblue. Already they had to lease 321 due to increase in demand.
With the traffic growth last year, think of how much travel there would be in only ten years time?