That's great to hear. However, if we compare the business class passenger in flying from ISB to LGW, vs. LHR to JFK, there is a clear distinction. PAX from JFK would, I would assume, book much later, and hence pay a premium for the late booking. In fact, in 2021, 28% of all PAX from LHR were business travellers. Meanwhile, I believe it would be safe to suggest most PAX to/from ISB are leisure travellers (exception being domestic travellers to destinations like Karachi). Therefore, even if on both the routes the cabin is full, the above argument would suggest passengers from LHR to JFK would pay more for the same seat compared to LGW to ISB.faisal-777 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2025 12:24 pmLast year i got upgraded 2 times and barely saw any empty seat in business class on flights to/from PK, with mostly appearing as if they had booked it themselves. The business class is not the reason - there are wealthy people in both directions enough to fill the business class.Averagespotter wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:58 pmVirgin Atlantic stopped coming to Pakistan as well, presumably because they couldn't fill their business class cabins which makes them real money. BA is probably suffering with the same issue, which is why they moved to Gatwick. Pakistan barely has any demand for business/premium travel which is why many airlines don't operate here (added the complexities of operations to pakistan).ba260 wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 5:28 am I hope British Airways responds and increases service within Pakistan, versus maintaining the 3 weekly flights they operate from LGW. BA should be back to serving Pakistan on daily basis.
With that being said, I agree that in the long run (where equipment limitations is not an issue), this factor alone is not enough for BA to reduce capacity, but in the short run, it would make a lot of sense for them to first maximise profitability on their more lucrative routes.